The Resilience
Personality Spectrum Tapestry ![]() Select the section that interests you. |
|
Evolutionary Selection ... ensures Lineage Persistence (survival).
Evolution - The mechanism (awesome) that enables the Lineage of The Living to persist, despite changes to the environment that it is in synergy with.
No One Thing ever exists in isolation. In fact, there is no One Thing. All exists as at least two things ... in relationship with one another (excluding That Which Was, the moment before The Big Bang, ... maybe.)
Thus, an "A" is always in relationship with a "B". If the relationship persists, then synergy between A and B exists. For The Living, this synergy is required for survival and propagation of the Individual. Survival and propagation of the Individual is how The Lineage persists.
Whether minor or enormous, random phenotype fluctuations within one member of a synergy grouping increases the chance that the synergy with The Other remains intact if "The Other" is also changing unexpectedly. For brevity, ConserveLiberty will leave the proof via rigorously credible statistical math up to the reader. Since "environment" is ALWAYS changing, then random gene changing is required for survival (persistence) of The Lineage.
For the "inheritance-based" living, inheritable traits are ultimately governed at the genetic level. Gene changing occurs predominantly during the replication process. That changes would occur during replication is consistent with the Fundamental Rule or Prerequisite of Variation - nothing is ever an exact duplication of whatever "the other" is. There will always be a difference, however slight.
The Ultimate and Fundamental Prerequisite Math (Big Math) that governs and ensures that the "difference (variation) boundary condition" is always met AND "is not fully predictable" is not understood (at all). ConserveLiberty thus refers to the mechanism of difference generation as "random".
ConserveLiberty regards Resilience as the manifestation of solutions-oriented behaviors and perspectives under many different circumstances. Evolution, which is not based on cognitive intent, is the ultimate Resilient behavior. Without evolution, life would have perished after the first one or few generations of its manifestation. Since the individual is ultimately "terminal" and is simply a stepping stone to the next individual in The Lineage, then reproduction is certainly important for Life. More importantly, evolution is of ultimate importance in order for reproduction to contribute in practical terms to the survival (Resilience) of The Lineage.
"Life is uncertain. Don't Sip!" - Advice on a Lagunitas beer label.
There are billions of examples of evolution as a necessary and required component leading to Lineage Resilience (Persistence).
Evolutionary Selection - a few selected examples below:
- Selective Evolution was/is itself selected for:
- Adaptation - the "entity" is able to coexist "be sustained as an entity" within its environment.
- All "environments" change. Nothing stays the same (a Fundamental Rule/Prerequisite). Not even "nothing" stays the same (the Big Bang was "nothing" becoming "All That Is").
- Thus, since "entities" exist within environments, and all environments change, then entities that randomly change may continue coexisting within the environment that they are in ... that continues changing. Some changes result in an entity that persists. Other changes do not. Some entities continue. Others cease or become extinct. In the end, another change.
- Thus, persistence, or Resilience, requires change.
- Evolution is thus the mechanism of action (MOA) of Resilience. Evolution enables persistence of existence.
- Since evolution drives the "selection for that which survives" ... and the process of Evolution has survived among all that persists ... then Evolution has been Selected For.
- Mosquito and mammal synergies ← click to examine below
evolutionarily selected multi-host synergies enabling multi-stage reproductive persistence.
- Galápagos Islands ← click to examine below
examples of evolutionary selective persistence.
- The Timeline of Life on Earth ← click to examine below
- Snakes ← click to examine below
- Non-genetically Determined Behavioral Adaptations ← click to examine below
- A short list of other examples → [can be found here.] ←
Evolutionary Selection - Example: Mosquito and mammal synergies
The challenge of malaria within the human population is a huge one ... from the perspective of the humans contracting the disease. From the mosquito's perspective, and the perspective of the Plasmodium that manifests itself as malaria when in a productive relationship with a human (its perspective) everything is going just fine.
Let's remind ourselves what "the living process" is all about, fundamentally. (The Secret to Life - in plain sight.):Malaria is caused by parasitic protozoans known as Plasmodium. In humans, the primary species causing malaria is Plasmodium falciparum. In a complex series of steps, the life-cycle of the Plasmodium is as follows:
![]()
- Starting point - The Living "Individual" is "active." It is alive. Now what?
- The Individual, if completely isolated (a closed system), and nothing else at all occurs other than existing, is losing energy.
Another way of stating this is that "entropy is increasing". In a closed system, entropy always increases (or stays the same in an "ideal" situation ) unless "external work is performed on the system." This is the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
Since, strictly speaking, there are no ideal systems, all closed systems tend towards increasing entropy. The energy in ALL closed systems diminishes with time.
- Thus, for an Individual to continue as a Living Process, that process/individual requires energy from outside itself to be added to it. In other words, a Living Process is not a truly closed system.
This understanding of "Living Individuals" from the perspective of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is discussed here. ←
Where might the energy that a Living Process needs to continue living come from?
- Answer: anywhere that energy is available to be "taken". Consumed. Assimilated. Added. Whatever. In the end, Living Processes that are going to continue living will take what is available however it is available.
- There is no "right way" or "wrong way." There is only THE WAY, and THE WAY is asymmetric. For example, heat only flows from warmer (an indicator or "more" energy) to cooler (an indicator or "less" energy) bodies. That's it.
- So, where might the energy come from? Sunlight (photon energy), food (chemical energy), gravity (pulling All That Is together again), etc. The Living will come up with a way to obtain the energy it needs to sustain itself any way that it eventually can. (The essence of successful Resilience!) Else, it dies. (No longer Persistent.)
- Jumping billions of years of random "selected-thru-survival" change (evolution) later, we find a situation that results in the phenomenon of malaria for humans and survival for the Plasmodium that use humans as one step in the mechanism of action that enables their survival.
- Sporozoites, are injected by the insect vector into the vertebrate host's blood.
- Sporozoites infect the host liver, giving rise to merozoites.
- Merozoites move into the blood, where they infect red blood cells.
- In the red blood cells, the merozoites reproduce asexually, eventually bursting the blood cells, whereby the merozoites go on to infect other red blood cells. Alternatively, the merozoites can become gametocytes, either male or female, which will then go on to create Plasmodium via sexual reproduction.
The gametocytes are taken up by insects that feed on the vertebrate host.![]()
Anopheles Gambiae- The gametocytes are transferred to the mosquito's midgut lumen where they differentiate into male and female gametes.
- After sexual reproduction and successive sporogonic development, the parasites grow into new sporozoites, which move to the insect's salivary glands.
- From the insect's salivary glands, they can now infect a vertebrate host bitten by the insect.
- ... and the cycle repeats.
One can see that there are several stages and environments that the Plasmodium moves through as it traverses its life cycles. In fact, "The Individual" doesn't persist throughout the entire life cycle. The "Individuals" are simply stepping stones along the way as the Plasmodium Lineage traverses through its cycle. Much like Human Lineages are composed of "Individuals" that are simply stepping stones along the way as a Human Family Lineage traverses its "generational life cycles."
Evolutionarily speaking, the Plasmodium simply go about advancing their Lineage generation by generation in a bit more clever way than humans or other mammals do.
Each Plasmodium stage requires its own ensembles of genes to make them work. And each of these genes are candidates for randomly generated genetic changes that may be useful for promoting continued Plasmodium persistence (Resilience!) when various aspects of the environment that it finds itself in changes.
These include the genes that govern Plasmodium behavior.
And, in a further twist, since both mosquitos and mammals are also involved, there are genes within each of them that are also important for Plasmodium persistence. For example, the instinctive target preference for the mosquito carrying the Plasmodium, or the time of day it prefers to acquire its blood meal!
A few of the genes involved in each of these Plasmodium stages, mosquito vectors, and mammalian targets have been seen to change in a way that correlates with various issues important for understanding and managing human malarial infections.
Example - "The Selection for Behavioral Resistance". (The selection of instinctive behavior mutations which improve the survival characteristics of predators or pathogen carriers due to actions undertaken by their targets.):
- How Mosquito Nets Can Shape the Evolution of Behavior
- How medicine usage and systemic human error in implementing eradication programs results in selection for drug and testing method resistant strains and behaviors. ← Random Evolution IS the mechanism of action for how Living Lineages manifest Resilience.
- Selected References
Evolutionary Selection - Galápagos Islands examples: (synergies rendered less complex, and thus more easily comprehended and observed, due to the more relatively restricted closed system).
The Galápagos Islands are (were) a relatively isolated grouping of islands in the Pacific Ocean 600 miles off the west coast of Ecuador.
The islands are known for their vast number of endemic species and were studied by Charles Darwin during the second voyage of HMS Beagle, as his observations and collections contributed to the inception of Darwin's theory of evolution by means of natural selection.
The Galápagos are interesting, among other things, because their relative isolation from other nearby land masses created a geographic barrier restricting the interaction and breeding with other species not endemic to the islands. It also limited predation from abroad, including predation from humans for a time. The result is that the subspecies that evolved in symbiosis with the Galápagos environment are relatively unique, found only on the island.
The first recorded visit to the islands by humans was in 1535. However, archeological evidence exists suggesting the islands were inhabited by South American peoples long before that. After found by the Europeans, the Galápagos were exploited for hundreds of years for all the things humans take control and manage the land and seas for. Charles Darwin did not arrive at the Galápagos until 1835.
The Galápagos were not designated a national park until 1959. Still, the island's endemic plants and animals continued to be displaced, harvested, or driven to extinction by the introduction of non-native plants and animals and the hunting by humans both for food and commercial trade until the mid-2000s. For example, in 1959 1-2,000 people lived on the island. By 2000 the figure was more than 25,000.
More on the current environmental protection policy for the Galápagos
→ [can be found here] ←
The species evolution that occurred on the Galápagos is another example of Resilience in Action. And the mechanism of action responsible for the Resilience of The Lineage was Random Evolution itself. Examples of such resilience manifested thru "evolutionary selective persistence," both in regard to physical adaptation and the adaptation of behavioral instincts (both driven genetically) are:
The Galapagos land iguana![]()
Galapagos Islands Land Iguana- The Marine iguana
- The Galápagos tortoise
- The Galápagos green turtle
The Flightless cormorant![]()
Blue-footed booby- The Blue-footed booby
- The Galapagos penguin
- The Waved albatross
- The Galapagos hawk
- Darwin's finches (the Galápagos finches) - a group of approximately 15 closely related birds which evolved on the Galápagos Islands. An ancestral relative arrived on the islands 2-3 million years ago.
- The Española cactus finch, a large cactus finch, is one of the species which evolved from that ancestor.
What is so fascinating about the Galápagos are the examples it gives with regard to the Resilience of the Living process when it is "challenged" with differing environments that are not easy to change and yet need to be adapted to. In this case, the environment, while changing, changes fairly slowly. And the living that are found there, while mobile, are prevented from easily relocating to environments that are more symbiotic with them. Thus, the random changes that occur with each incidence of reproductive "renewal" have provided the mechanism of action to be resilient within the Galápagos environments they found themselves in.
The changes are random, and "randomness" by its nature is not self-directed. The resiliency is in reality a "statistical resiliency." Reproduce enough, with each reproduction generating a random change, and if The Lineage is "lucky", then a random change will occur that is more symbiotic with the environment that an individual from The Lineage may find itself within. In that case, The Lineage survives, being a little different than the individuals that came before. And for those individuals reproduced with changes that were not symbiotically improved, then if there are sufficient mismatches between the individuals and the environments they find themselves in that do not promote further survival before the next replication ... that branch of The Lineage will cease to live. Termination. Extinction.
Evolutionary Selection - The Timeline of Life on Earth:
To illustrate the Resiliency of the Living, we focus here on major challenges to the continuation of living phenomenon throughout Earth's history, which spans 4.5 billion years.
The Major Extinction Events.
- The Great Oxygenation Event (GOE) - 2.45 Ga.
- The Huronian glaciation (2.4 Ga - 2.1 Ga) - the oldest and longest ice age, occurring at a time when only simple, unicellular life existed on Earth. This ice age led to a mass extinction on Earth. It is considered the first Snowball Earth.
- The Ordovician-Silurian extinction events (455-430 Ma) - Almost all major taxonomic groups were affected during this global extinction event. 49-60% of marine genera and nearly 85% of marine species were eliminated.
- The Late Devonian extinction (375-360 Ma) - Overall, 19% of all families and 50% of all genera became extinct.
- The Permian-Triassic extinction event (The Great Dying) - (252 Ma) - The Earth's most severe known extinction event, with up to 96% of all marine species and 70% of terrestrial vertebrate species becoming extinct. The impact crater (near the Falkland Islands) may have been found. Other possible causes are also plausible, and under serious investigation.
- The Triassic-Jurassic extinction event (201.3 Ma) - In the seas, 34% of marine genera disappeared. On land, all archosaurs other than crocodylomorphs, pterosaurs, dinosaurs, some remaining therapsids, and many of the large amphibians became extinct.
- Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event (66 Ma) - a sudden mass extinction of some three-quarters of the plant and animal species on Earth.
- It is generally thought that the K-Pg extinction was caused by the impact of a massive comet or asteroid 10 to 15 km (6.2 to 9.3 mi.) wide.
- About those dinosaurs ... they may have been in decline for 40 million years before impact. Check out this article ← for a nice, skeptical, and relatively thorough reanalysis and retesting of the data we have on the topic.
Note that with each extinction event, all life did not go extinct.
The way life works (The Secret of Life) is it is reproductive, and randomly adaptive. The Individual is not the objective. Rather, the individual is the stepping stone along The Living Lineage to the next individual, which is ... ??
Random mutations dispersed among all individuals helps insure that at least one of them will be sufficiently adapted to what comes next with the next step, which cannot be foreseen.
Evolutionary Selection - Snakes:
Much is known regarding the appearance of snakes in the fossil record and their various phylogenetic relationships with one another. What is generally never known in the fossil record is "who came first." Thus, it could be possible, but has not been validated (and may not be) that snakes (which are reptiles without legs that have appeared independently within the fossil record several different times) may have begun their evolution from lizard to snake first with a mutation in the Zone of Polarizing Activity Regulatory Sequence (ZRS) region of the sonic hedgehog (SHH) gene.![]()
An Indian Cobra.
Among other things, SHH is critically required for limb and digit development. This would not have been just any lizard mutant (i.e. changed, genetically different). It may have evolved from burrowing lizards, such as the varanids (or a similar group) during the Cretaceous Period. The bodies may have already been streamlined for burrowing, and the loss of legs was just one more random event.
If the special mutant maintained the fortunate instinct of Resilience and continued to mate and reproduce, then one or more offspring from this SHH mutant may have been rendered, over hundreds of generations, sufficiently able to survive in whatever environment it had wound up in ... as snakes.
Other hypothesis are also credible. The primary message is ... "Branches of The Grand Lineage either find a way or they terminate right there and then."
That "Life" is always unfolding in a way that could find a way (i.e. it is always mutating a little, randomly) is why ConserveLiberty asserts that Resilience is manifested within the process of Evolution itself. Again and again and again.
Non-genetically Determined Behavioral Adaptations
Are these embraceable behavioral options actually specific adaptability features that the "Essential and Resilient Me" is built with? Are these "habits and addictions" which develop? Or are they evolved optional preferences, and thus latent instincts?
The short list of examples below (relevant to animals) also stimulates the Reward System, leading to habituation and addiction. Question: "Are the "addictions" that can be generated via the Reward System (and all of them are!) simply accidents of neurobiochemistry and physiology, or are they informative because perhaps they are coincidental with "The Essential Me?"
- Intoxicant use
- Sex interest
Risk taking (various manifestations, from gambling to reaching for extreme achievement).
Dream.
Believe.
- Attention seeking - "Hey, look at me!"
- News, Sports, Entertainment, and Art communication of all forms
- "Social Media" - designed to be "addictive," or simply attractive because they enable the communication of "Me?"
- The Internet
- Albert Einstein, believing All That Is could be explained in a unified way, when asked about Relativity, explained, "Put your hand on a hot stove for a minute and it seems like an hour. Sit with a pretty girl for an hour, and it seems like a minute." Was he actually commenting on something about Resilience and the Persistence that we are and are not drawn to?